Conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory
Assessing the long-term effects of the safe dates program and a booster in preventing and reducing adolescent dating violence victimization and perpetration. Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63, 1—168.
Parents’ anger and relationship quality and youth’s prior perpetration of adolescent relationship abuse as well as gender, age, and race/ethnicity predicted class membership, informing universal prevention program and message design, as well as indicated efforts to target communications and services for parents as well as for youth.
The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or the official position of the U. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice or any other organization. Giordano for her contributions to the STRi V instrument design and Lauren Bishop for her assistance with presenting the results.
Registration, purchasing, activation of tokens, e-prints and other features of Your Account will be unavailable during this scheduled release.
Articles will remain available for view or download, where access rights already apply.
: Training in conflict resolution strategies is a goal in different intervention contexts, and the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory is a proven, useful tool for assessing these skills.
Two studies were conducted, one aimed at analyzing psychometric properties of this instrument, and the other at verifying its ability to discriminate between violent and non-violent adolescent dating partners.
This longitudinal study draws on separate parent (58 % female; 61 % White non-Hispanic, 12 % Black non-Hispanic, 7 % other non-Hispanic, and 20 % Hispanic) and youth (ages 12–18 years; 48 % female) surveys from the nationally representative Survey of Teen Relationships and Intimate Violence. conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.This study utilizes data from 5,797 6 comprehensive approach to a “standard of care” approach (Safe Dates).The present study focuses on student survey data from the first two school years of the evaluation–baseline and follow-up (2012-2013) and fall and spring follow-up (2013-2014).The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Grant No. Points of views in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.
2011-WG-BX-0020 awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.
Indicators of convergent, concurrent and predictive validity are also provided.