Carbon 14 dating debate
You can find some further good information here: -- read the full page if you get the chance.
Agroforestry—the practice of growing trees and crops in interacting combinations—is recognized worldwide as an integrated approach to sustainable land-use.
Here I will present what radiocarbon is, the dating methods, the assumptions that govern them, and the known discrepancies that plague the method.
With a thorough understanding of this dating method, it is my opinion that its ingenious fundamentals can be appreciated, yet greatly overshadowed by its limitations.
And this big sequence is then used to 'correct' C14 dates. (3.) Even if the rate of decay is constant, without a knowledge of the exact ratio of C12 to C14 in the initial sample, the dating technique is still subject to question.
(4.) Traditional 14C testing assumes equilibrium in the rate of formation and the rate of decay.
Though they may know it as carbon dating or carbon 14 dating, there is an understood notion that when anything old is found, like an ancient artifact, it can be radiocarbon dated to find out exactly how old it is.
Yet, as simple and straightforward as this seems, the process of dating objects via radiocarbon is far from simple and straightforward.
(2.) I just listened to a series of lectures on archaeology put out by John Hopkins Univ.
In fact, 14C is forming FASTER than the observed decay rate.
This skews the 'real' answer to a much younger age.
We believe all the dates over 5,000 years are really compressible into the next 2,000 years back to creation.
So when you hear of a date of 30,000 years for a carbon date we believe it to be early after creation and only about 7,000 years old.One of the impressive points Whitewall makes is the conspicuous absence of dates between 4,500 and 5,000 years ago illustrating a great catastrophe killing off plant and animal life world wide (the flood of Noah)!I hope this helps your understanding of carbon dating.Libby, the discoverer of the C14 dating method, was very disappointed with this problem.